Critique of Research Studies Part-3 Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

limited review of Studies Part-3 - Research Paper ExampleThe research had two groups, with one on the self-management services program magic spell the other one was Non-SMS. The researchers assumed that the differences between the two groups were the result of the self-management services program. The research used statistical Package for Social Sciences for Windows (version 16 SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) as the main statistical analysis tool. Comparison of the two groups in the study relied on the v2 test and variance analysis. In order to estimate the time and ratings of the dialysis process, the researchers opted for the KaplanMeier method. These methods successfully helped see to it for the occurrence of confounding variables. The researchers minimized the occurrence of both type 1 and 2 types of errors by ensuring a careful calculation of a significant p-value that served as a guide in the rejection of either the unsatisfying and the alternate hypotheses. The nurses charged with the role of data collection and entry did a diligent job because on that point was no issue of missing data since data was available for the 54 patients. Findings The researchers present comprehensive purpose from the two groups with emphasis accorded to the statistical significance. In all cases, the p-value is provided and there is separate of result size of it as the researchers focused on establishing the differences between the two groups of patients suffering from chronic kidney disease. There is good user of tables and figures in the representation results. The confidence intervals seem reasonable in addressing the parameters for an unknown population. Moreover, the presented findings from both groups and variables considered suffice to allow a meta-analysis in comparison to different sets of data obtained from related studies. Discussion Interpretation of Findings It is evident that the researchers embarked on an large process of interpreting the presented results. Th ere is an elaboration of the meaning and significance of measuring all the variables highlighted in the report. Apparently, the researchers tolerate discussed the results within the framework described in the introduction. Therefore, the handling exhibits relevance to the context of chronic kidney disease and the effect of the self-management services. The researchers have made a point of justifying all the causal inferences inherent from their findings. Evidently, all interpretations provided in the discussion section have a good basis contextually, making them well founded. In addition, there is evidence of consistency of the discussions offered and the research limitations. As expected, the research presented its unique limitations especially in definition of the effect size that highlights the difference between the SMS and Non-SMS groups. The researchers also paid attention to the generalizability of the findings to a greater population. Implications/recommendations The resea rchers highlight the implications of their study in accordance to the presented findings. It becomes apparent that the self-management services program designed to address the issues that the patients consider as critical efficient in reducing the rate at which the